Skip to content
Comparison

IGA for Active Directory

Many IGA programs assume cloud-first catalogs. Mid-market Microsoft estates still grant critical access through AD groups. IGA for Active Directory means ownership, reviews, and revocation that change the directory — not only attest on a spreadsheet.

Spreadsheet / ticket reviews

Manual attestation with weak remediation.

Only as a temporary stopgap.

Strengths

  • Low software cost
  • Familiar to auditors who accept screenshots

Trade-offs

  • Revokes often never hit AD
  • No dry-run of membership removals
  • Evidence quality collapses under scale

Cloud-only IGA

Strong for SaaS; thin for on-prem AD groups.

When almost all entitlements are cloud apps.

Strengths

  • Modern UX
  • Good SaaS connector stories

Trade-offs

  • Multi-domain AD day-2 work still lives elsewhere
  • Hybrid memberships fall through cracks

Rivitan (hybrid Microsoft)

AD + Entra governance with reviews that revoke.

When AD groups still matter and Entra is part of the same estate.

Strengths

  • AD-aware reviews and operations
  • Dry-run then apply remediation
  • Hygiene for stale accounts and empty groups
  • Path to Entra and broader portals without changing the core story

Trade-offs

  • Not a universal connector IGA for every legacy ERP
  • Best fit is Microsoft-centric hybrid estates

The verdict

If Active Directory still holds critical access, your IGA program must remediate AD — not only certify cloud packages. Rivitan is built for that hybrid Microsoft wedge.

Ready to simplify enterprise IAM?

Book a free 30-minute discovery call. We'll talk through your identity estate and where the biggest wins are — platform, advisory, or both.

Book a Call